I suppose that this game can be seen as warmup for Arch Madness: playing a game that we aren't expected to win in Missouri.
It would be nice to keep Mosley under twenty points and stay even on the boards. Kithier would be big help against Prim, but I would think that making sure that he is ready to come back is more important than pushing it for this game.
-12 :thumbsup:
I usually make the 2.5 hour drive from Tulsa to Springfield for this game, but not this year.....
They are pressuring our top of the key handoff offensive well.
Mosley picked up his pivot foot on that fadeaway step bucket.
Is this game on tv? What channel. Not available on ESPN+
How do you not call that Mosley push off? He extends his elbow on Darius to get space...
NBC Sports Chicago
What an embarrassment.
What can you do, when they are hitting some ridiculous shots? I wouldn't call that game an embarrassment. We just couldn't shoot in the second half, including several easy bunnies right at the hoop. I'd rather lose games through crappy shooting, versus high turnover games, so there is the only positive to come from this game. We can't shoot, but at least we don't have as many bone-headed turnovers :)
Yeah 2 guys shooting 2-11 is what we want to see.
A roster of limited talent....unlike what was advertised.
Another shellacking
3 more years of this...
(https://media1.giphy.com/media/QMHoU66sBXqqLqYvGO/giphy.gif)
Reminder.
If Clay would have stayed at Valpo we would have been touting him as our best player.
at MoSt he is usually a role player.
Let that soak in.
5 games left. I bet we don't win more than 1 of them.
I can't remember the last time I started watching a Valpo game that I didn't finish--until yesterday. :( This is really getting old.
Valpo's roster talent wise isn't as good as what was hyped prior to the start of the season. It will be interesting in the off season if we can improve the quality of talent.
I see that we have about 7-8 guys on this roster that will be replaced because they are seniors of some variety of time served, and then who knows if any of our freshmen transfer. I know Palesse was a redshirt, plus Connor Barrett, a sophomore, didn't really play, but I haven't followed the board as closely this season, but we have a lot of holes to fill for 2022-23, plus who knows if Lottich stays past 2023 with the new AD in July. I'll be reading the board a bit more frequently, but I have trying not to read all the board content as most of it reads the same as the game before.
Quote from: usc4valpo on February 13, 2022, 08:25:48 AMValpo's roster talent wise isn't as good as what was hyped prior to the start of the season.
True and false. With every roster player fully healthy I thought we were top 4 and with a few breaks might finish better. In retrospect 5'th was closer to being true. Even with Trevor, Slim and Connor healthy the matchups with MSU are bad and losing 7 out of 10 to them sounds about right. I think they win in St Louis.
Quote from: valporun on February 13, 2022, 09:57:55 AM
I see that we have about 7-8 guys on this roster that will be replaced because they are seniors of some variety of time served, and then who knows if any of our freshmen transfer. I know Palesse was a redshirt, plus Connor Barrett, a sophomore, didn't really play, but I haven't followed the board as closely this season, but we have a lot of holes to fill for 2022-23, plus who knows if Lottich stays past 2023 with the new AD in July. I'll be reading the board a bit more frequently, but I have trying not to read all the board content as most of it reads the same as the game before.
Not true. Only Anderson, Taylor and Gordon are done eligibility wise. We have one signed guy right now. Kithier and King have another year available. I would expect Emil to graduate and get on with his engineering career though he is only a junior eligibility wise.
Quote from: vu72 on February 13, 2022, 10:30:13 AM
Quote from: valporun on February 13, 2022, 09:57:55 AM
I see that we have about 7-8 guys on this roster that will be replaced because they are seniors of some variety of time served, and then who knows if any of our freshmen transfer. I know Palesse was a redshirt, plus Connor Barrett, a sophomore, didn't really play, but I haven't followed the board as closely this season, but we have a lot of holes to fill for 2022-23, plus who knows if Lottich stays past 2023 with the new AD in July. I'll be reading the board a bit more frequently, but I have trying not to read all the board content as most of it reads the same as the game before.
Not true. Only Anderson, Taylor and Gordon are done eligibility wise. We have one signed guy right now. Kithier and King have another year available. I would expect Emil to graduate and get on with his engineering career though he is only a junior eligibility wise.
I'm still saying 7-8 guys from the roster are gone, because we have the three without eligibility, will Kithier want to play another season if he's still having lingering back issues, does King want another year, and will Woodyard or Young want to stay when they aren't playing at the level they thought they would?
Quote from: oklahomamick on February 13, 2022, 06:56:00 AM
5 games left. I bet we don't win more than 1 of them.
We *should* beat Evansville twice. Unless we have a complete cerebral reversal, I don't see another win. Maybe Thursday at Arch Sadness
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All the hype some posters were raving about pre-season was, in part, because of the transfers in from the Big 10. But other than K King(who had been sitting out the previous year, these transfers were not big-time starters and stars on a regular basis for their previous schools. Plus now playing 2 freshman point-guards who are not scoring threats doesn't help either. And then there were all the injuries. At the post game presser the other night the 3 players with Lottich were all transfers and had never played together before this year, and then have not played together in every game this year. Valpo is like some other D-1 teams who had many transfers in and for whatever reason the coaching staffs were not able to put together a big-time winner. Indiana comes to mind right off the bat. Too much pre-season hype and a staff that was not able to get it all put together. Wouldn't it be great to get a pleasant surprise next year altho that would really surprise me? Other MVC schools have had their problems too...look at the recent poor seasons from IL ST., IN ST., Evansville and maybe lack of a real good year from MO ST. Is it because of poor coaching at these schools? Let's face it, for a team to be successful YOU NEED A GOOD POINT GUARD who can also be a scoring threat. And recently we have not had one.
Not having a good point guard for 6 years is on Lottich.
Quote from: oklahomamick on February 14, 2022, 09:53:35 AM
Not having a good point guard for 6 years is on Lottich.
Maybe he thought Siggy and Sackey were the answers.
The fact that he recruited a 5-9 kid from Norway instead of a kid from Indiana who probably would have been better is just insane. But not as exotic!
Quote from: Valpo89 on February 14, 2022, 10:42:07 AM
Quote from: oklahomamick on February 14, 2022, 09:53:35 AM
Not having a good point guard for 6 years is on Lottich.
Maybe he thought Siggy and Sackey were the answers.
The fact that he recruited a 5-9 kid from Norway instead of a kid from Indiana who probably would have been better is just insane. But not as exotic!
I actually like Darius and Preston, but they are freshman and have flaws in their game, which is to be expected from freshman.
Also he finally found a senior PG in Trevor Anderson this year but he was plagued by injuries. When he was healthy, he played well at the 1.
I think Lottich not have a coherent system is his real flaw just as much as not having a true PG for all those years. Lottich tried a bunch of hybrid PGs over the last 6 years.
Quote from: VU2014 on February 13, 2022, 10:37:51 PMthe Team is probably not as talented as most of the fanbase had hoped, but also underperforming (even if missing TA).
The fatal flaw for this team was not the point guard. Trevor was great when healthy and the freshman were both fully adequate back up apprentices. Our major weakness was always the 2 and that was why Anderson was eventually slid to that position thus transferring our major weakness from the 2 to the point. Preseason I would have thought the 2 could have been filled by Barrett or Gordon or Edwards or somebody. I was wrong and force fitting square pegs into round holes doesn't work well at the MVC level.
If you go back 6 years ago and look at some post on the forum you will see that several of us were upset the all HL conference team didn't have more valpo players. We were saying that our 6-8 players would start on all the other conference teams.
Quote from: SanityLost17 on February 12, 2022, 07:39:03 PMReminder. If Clay would have stayed at Valpo we would have been touting him as our best player. at MoSt he is usually a role player. Let that soak in.
Too be fair, I don't think a lot of us would have thought that... Even last year, he was our 3rd best player and should have had a role more similar to his this year. If he was on our team this year, Krikke, Kithier, King, Edwards, Taylor all would be scoring threats above him (whether he would have been happy to being a role player behind those is a different story).
I still think that the issue with this team has nothing to do with talent or even offense play-calling or structure.
I think it's all a mental concern. This team seems to think things are just going to happen for them and seem baffled when they don't. We have seen multiple years now of hearing how great things go in practice, how ready they are, who is going to be the x factor on the team and than they get on the floor and it doesn't appear. However, we do see moments where we get what they were talking about but my biggest concern is that there seems to be a lack of urgency in our playing or preparing for the season. We don't make things happen, we don't play consistently, we have sporadic output from players and can't adjust and I honestly think it speaks to a softness or of lack of preparation on a team psychology level more than anything that can be fixed by new X's and O's