After the Wake Forest game I posted a critical list of observed coaching weaknesses. This was largely disregarded or passively aggressively referenced because individual players themselves performed decently well . I unfortunately only continued to witness these problems in last nights game. Major ones from tonights game.
Recent Valpo coaching tenets:
1) little investment or success n developing players over multiple years.
2) Defense / rebounding remains subpar.
3) little investment or success in free throw shooting
4) team continues to live or die by the 3
5) Continued inability to learn from previous mistakes.
These are systemic weakneses of the new Valpo program that will only be addressed if fans and the team are honest with themselves. Just because the team played moderately well against Wake Forest but still displayed these serious coaching problems is a nod to the potential talent of our players.
My concern with us Valpo fans is that we seem to be willing to accept core coaching and team culture problems for the sake of small wins or near misses (e.g. Wake Forest). Im also concerned that we refuse to be critical of our coaching staff (well paid, mature adults) but are more keen to be critical of individual players ( students).
Recent Valpo coaching tenets:
1) little investment or success n developing players over multiple years.
2) Defense / rebounding remains subpar.
3) little investment or success in free throw shooting
4) team continues to live or die by the 3
5) Continued inability to learn from previous mistakes.
These are systemic weakneses of the new Valpo program that will only be addressed if fans and the team are honest with themselves. Just because the team played moderately well against Wake Forest but still displayed these serious coaching problems is a nod to the potential talent of our players.
My concern with us Valpo fans is that we seem to be willing to accept core coaching and team culture problems for the sake of small wins or near misses (e.g. Wake Forest). Im also concerned that we refuse to be critical of our coaching staff (well paid, mature adults) but are more keen to be critical of individual players ( students).