This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: VUGrad1314 on August 25, 2018, 02:38:51 AMArticle on Loyola's future. http://www.valleyhoopsinsider.com/whats-next-for-loyola/
Quote from: valpo84 on February 06, 2018, 09:50:12 AMdawg, it's also finding a point of emphasis for that ref to call the foul. If a moving pick isn't being a called, a discussion with the ref about moving picks may lead to a call later. It's, shall we say, getting that ref to be inclined to find the infraction.
Quote from: VU2014 on February 05, 2018, 10:00:55 AMIt is a coaching art to "work the refs" for calls and longtime coaches like Ben Jacobson or Barry Hinson can get the benefit of the doubt and have some pull, particularly at home. There were a TON of "hometown" calls on Saturday. The refs tried to make a few makeup calls but the damage was done when they put our bigs in foul trouble in the 2nd half with ticky-tac BS foul calls. Jay and Smits couldn't be aggressive on the boards.
Quote from: bbtds on February 01, 2018, 04:56:51 AMQuote from: VU2014 on January 31, 2018, 11:51:27 PMI thought it was a solid game by the officials and we had some ticky tack calls on us with one truly horrendous call on BakariI thought the refs were fairly inconsistent. Sometimes they called ticky tack fouls but other times they didn't and players on both teams got frustrated by their calls. When you notice the refs in a game that generally means they weren't great at the officiating. From an administrator on the IN State message board: My thing is I'm fine with however refs want to call it, but you damn well better call it consistently. When a hook is a hook on one end but not the other, that's a problem. I don't feel like Valley officials call it consistently the same on both ends. If they did, I'd have no issues.
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 19 queries.